For additional reasons to avoid Ubuntu or Ubuntu-derived distributions, expand this section.
Ubuntu's paltry contributions to the upstream Libre projects they heavily rely upon is a policy decision and not a coincidence. Canonical founder Mark Shuttleworth has stated: "It is absolutely true we have no interest in the core fundamentals of the Linux kernel, none whatsoever." [
https://web.archive.org/web/20191219195949/https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2168086/canonical-linux-kernel
]
Canonical only bothers to majorly contribute in any way when forking significant projects; for example, Wayland into Mir, GNOME into Unity [
https://web.archive.org/web/20150912223445/https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/25127/how-to-build-unity-in-fedora/
], and .deb packages incompatible with Debian because of zstd compression. [
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Ubuntu-Zstd-Deb-Packages
] This appears to be a consistent attempt to fragment the software stack to lock in users and put pressure on competing distributions and vendors. [
https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/25376.html
] [
https://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/Mir-vs.-Wayland-show-why-upstream-projects-matter
]
The Ubuntu Contributor License Agreement gives them complete power over patents that cover contributed code. Essentially they are granted the right to re-license this code under any license of their choice, including a proprietary one.
Ubuntu also has a history of treating staff in a hostile fashion. For example, the Kubuntu spin project lead was unilaterally removed without warning and contrary to wishes of his team members. [
https://kver.wordpress.com/2015/05/27/making-sense-of-the-kubuntucanonical-leadership-spat/
] Canonical also pilfered donation funds originally meant for desktop spin projects (Kubuntu, Lubuntu and others). In Kubuntu's case, after funding was abruptly dropped, Blue Systems had to step in to save the popular project. [
https://www.pcworld.com/article/424171/kubuntus-founder-resigns-accuses-canonical-of-defrauding-donors-and-violating-copyright.html
] [
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kubuntu-devel/2012-February/005782.html
]
Canonical has also been applying an absurd intellectual property (IP) policy over packages in its repositories for years. This resulted in claims that Canonical owns the copyright over any binaries compiled by their servers. After the FSF stepped in and arranged a resolution over a period of two years, the policy was amended to state that Canonical’s IP policy cannot override packages with GPL licenses. However, this now means that any package with a permissive license is now copyrighted by Canonical. [
https://www.fsf.org/news/canonical-updated-licensing-terms
] [
https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/37113.html
]
Unfortunately, downstream forks based on Ubuntu cannot be relied upon either. For example, the popular Linux Mint distribution was threatened with being cut off from access to Ubuntu infrastructure unless they caved in to Canonical's binary licensing terms. [
https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=152450
] Since then, Linux Mint has developed a version based on Debian instead. Canonical's vague trademark and IP policy has become toxic for downstream distributions. Many have made the smart choice to re-base on Debian instead of Ubuntu over the years including Kali, {{project_name_short}} [ [[Dev/Operating_System#Switch_from_Ubuntu_to_Debian]]
] and others. [
https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/45939.html
]
A final major concern is Canonical's friendly relationship with Microsoft. This should make all Linux users uncomfortable, given Microsoft's strategy of "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" with respect to Free Software. [
https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-and-canonical-partner-to-bring-ubuntu-to-windows-10/
]
= Introduction =
A lot contention is derived from the different word definitions of the word "security" by advocates of proprietary software versus Freedom Software. An attempt to explain the different positions can be found in chapter {{Archive_link
|url=https://www.kicksecure.com/wiki/Miscellaneous_Threats_to_User_Freedom#Freedom_vs_Tyrant_Security
|onion=http://w5j6stm77zs6652pgsij4awcjeel3eco7kvipheu6mtr623eyyehj4yd.onion/wiki/Miscellaneous_Threats_to_User_Freedom#Freedom_vs_Tyrant_Security
|text=Freedom vs Tyrant Security
}}.
= Windows Hosts =
{{Windows_Hosts}}
= macOS Hosts =
{{mbox
| type = notice
| image = [[File:Ambox_notice.png|40px|alt=Info]]
| text = This macOS Hosts chapter might need some improvements. [https://phabricator.whonix.org/T993 ticket]
}}
In a fashion similar to Windows platforms, Apple operating systems also pose many security and privacy threats.
'''Table:''' ''macOS Threats''