[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
From: Stein Gjoen <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 09:17:47 +0200
Cc: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]>
Resent-date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 03:17:46 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-from: [email protected]
Resent-message-id: <Ma9u4D.A.w0C.FZVd5@murphy>
Resent-sender: [email protected]

[email protected] wrote:
[big snip]

> My idea : let's go for /opt/doc and put this tree, if
> FSSTND comes with an intelligent place in the future,
> it will just be a matter of replacing /opt/doc by
> that in the future.

I don't expect FSSTND to be updated; rather it is superceeded by the
FHS (File Hierarchy Standard) which is intended to be a standard for
more operating systems than Linux alone.

More information is available at
	http://www.pathname.com/fhs/

I believe the path for LDP documents would be somewhere below
	/usr/share/doc

Regards,
   Stein Gjoen


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
  - From: Guylhem Aznar <[email protected]>

References:
- Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
  - From: <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
Next by Date: [Fwd: [Fwd: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the O'Reilly Open Source Convention]]
Previous by thread: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
Next by thread: Re: Idea : common dir and tree (Rep:Re: Why not create packages?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread