[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: experimental release of linuxdoc-tools (based on sgml-tools 1.0.9)
- To: Jorge Godoy <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: experimental release of linuxdoc-tools (based on sgml-tools 1.0.9)
- From: [email protected] (Cees de Groot)
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2000 21:02:22 +0200
- Cc: Taketoshi Sano <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
- In-reply-to: Your message of "17 May 2000 09:22:09 -0300." <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: [email protected]
- Resent-date: Wed, 17 May 2000 15:05:02 -0400 (EDT)
- Resent-from: [email protected]
- Resent-message-id: <7r130B.A.l9B.00uI5@murphy>
- Resent-sender: [email protected]
- Sender: [email protected]
[email protected] said:
> You changing the command name now will cause more trouble, IMHO..
He just changed the package name. I think the command names are still
"sgml2xxx", whereas SGMLtools-Lite has "sgmltools" (specifically done so it
doesn't conflict).
It looks like SGMLtools-Lite, in order to be compliant with the upcoming LSB
recommendation for SGML stuff, needs to parse out the document type of its
input document anyway; that would be an option to provide wrappers around
SGMLtools-Lite that call linuxdoc-tools (or whatever you call it - the "old
Perl stuff for LinuxDoc") so people could indeed trigger everything with
"sgmltools --backend....".
--
Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com <[email protected]>
http://sgmltools-lite.sourceforge.net/
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD 1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B
Forge your CipherSaber and list it: http://www.xs4all.nl/~cg/ciphersaber/
PGP signature